AI Visibility for Hotels and Resorts, Who AI names when buyers shop this category
1,000 real buyer questions run across 3 AI engines, and every company they named back.
Who the engines name when buyers ask
Every company named across 3,015 answers, ranked by how often the engines put them forward.
The leaderboard
Share of every company mention in the run
Where the voice goes
Top five against the rest of the field
Category concentration
- Leader alone
- 3.1%
- Top three
- 8.4%
- Top five
- 11.3%
- Top ten
- 16%
Every company named
The whole field, ranked. Search it, sort it, and open any company to read the questions that named it.
| Rank | Company | Share of voice | Answers | First | Avg. pos. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1% | 404 | 124 | #4.5 | 56 | 182 | 166 | ||
| 2 | 2.8% | 365 | 115 | #4.3 | 19 | 211 | 135 | ||
| 3 | 2.6% | 337 | 20 | #4.7 | 27 | 188 | 122 | ||
| 4 | 1.5% | 202 | 6 | #5.3 | 14 | 118 | 70 | ||
| 5 | 1.4% | 183 | 15 | #6 | 19 | 77 | 87 | ||
| 6 | 1.3% | 177 | 18 | #6 | 15 | 77 | 85 | ||
| 7 | 1.1% | 148 | - | #5.9 | 10 | 77 | 61 | ||
| 8 | 0.8% | 104 | 38 | #5.4 | 14 | 64 | 26 | ||
| 9 | 0.7% | 98 | 31 | #4.5 | 19 | 39 | 40 | ||
| 10 | 0.7% | 94 | 3 | #6.1 | 12 | 60 | 22 | ||
| 11 | 0.6% | 75 | 18 | #5 | 12 | 34 | 29 | ||
| 12 | 0.5% | 71 | 21 | #3.8 | 4 | 33 | 34 | ||
| 13 | 0.5% | 71 | - | #6.9 | 10 | 55 | 6 | ||
| 14 | 0.5% | 70 | 18 | #5.9 | 10 | 40 | 20 | ||
| 15 | 0.5% | 66 | 9 | #6.3 | 9 | 49 | 8 | ||
| 16 | 0.4% | 59 | 2 | #5.3 | 14 | 19 | 26 | ||
| 17 | 0.4% | 57 | 16 | #4.3 | 3 | 31 | 23 | ||
| 18 | 0.4% | 55 | 4 | #4.6 | 4 | 12 | 39 | ||
| 19 | 0.4% | 50 | 16 | #4.4 | 3 | 33 | 14 | ||
| 20 | 0.4% | 47 | 4 | #6.9 | 7 | 28 | 12 | ||
| 21 | 0.3% | 45 | 14 | #3.6 | 5 | 20 | 20 | ||
| 22 | 0.3% | 42 | - | #5 | 11 | 19 | 12 | ||
| 23 | 0.3% | 42 | - | #5.5 | · | 26 | 16 | ||
| 24 | 0.3% | 41 | 7 | #6.3 | 3 | 31 | 7 | ||
| 25 | 0.3% | 40 | 5 | #5.3 | 1 | 24 | 15 |
Expedia is named in 13.4% of answers and takes 3.1% of all company mentions. With 3,581 companies named exactly once, most of this category is noise around 7 names that actually carry weight.
The AI Visibility for Hotels and Resorts category is fragmented, led by Expedia with 3.1% of mentions.
5,242 companies were named across 3,015 answers, and no name owns this category in AI answers.
The short version
The category as the answers describe it
AI answers for US hotels and resorts are highly fragmented: Expedia leads the category with just 3.1% share of voice across 3,015 answers and 5,242 companies. Category concentration is 0.4, and the top 10 companies collectively hold 16.0% of mentions. The largest opening is wellness and spa travel, where Canyon Ranch leads 336 answers with only 2.8% share of voice across 634 companies.
Category leaders
These three lead the leaderboard with 3.1%, 2.8%, and 2.6% of mentions, respectively, while together accounting for 8.4%.
Established contenders
These companies hold 1.1% to 1.5% of mentions, placing them directly behind the three category leaders.
Specialist and loyalty visibility players
These companies each hold 0.5% to 0.8% of mentions, with Google Hotels reaching 63 conviction and Virtuoso reaching 64 conviction.
Long-tail named brands
Each of these companies holds 0.4% of mentions, illustrating the category's broad distribution beyond the leaders.
Expedia leads overall with 3.1% of mentions, 13.4% reach, and 124 first-place appearances. It also leads Fee, Policy and Accessibility Checkers at 6.8%, Domestic Leisure Trip Planners at 3.7%, and Value-Driven and Loyalty Bookers at 6.1%.
Gemini names Marriott as its leader at 3.1%, while GPT and Grok name Expedia at 2.1% and 4.4%, respectively.
Widely listed is not the same as actually recommended
Reach is how many answers name a company. Conviction is how hard those answers push it: a top pick counts fully, a passing mention barely counts at all. The dividers are this field's own averages.
How the engines cut this category up
The groupings the answers themselves used when they sorted companies, who leads each one, and who else sits in it.
Share of mentions by segment
How much of the category's attention each grouping absorbs
Who wins each buying decision
The category split into the decisions buyers actually make, and how tightly each one is held.
What buyers actually ask, and who answers it
Every question in this scan, placed by the decision it belongs to and the intent behind it. Each cell shows how many questions sit there and the company the engines name first.
| Informational | Comparison | Buy | Problem-Solving | Best Practices | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic Leisure Trip Planners | 60 | 75 | 135 | 36 | 27 |
| Value-Driven and Loyalty Bookers | 66 | 66 | 138 | 33 | 30 |
| Family and Pet Travelers | 66 | 66 | 135 | 33 | 33 |
| Business and Bleisure Travelers | 66 | 66 | 135 | 33 | 33 |
| Luxury and Resort Experience Seekers | 66 | 66 | 138 | 33 | 30 |
| Fee, Policy and Accessibility Checkers | 66 | 66 | 138 | 33 | 30 |
| Outdoor and National Park Travelers | 66 | 66 | 138 | 33 | 30 |
| Event, Meeting and Group Planners | 66 | 66 | 135 | 33 | 33 |
| Wellness and Spa Retreat Travelers | 66 | 66 | 138 | 33 | 33 |
Darker cells carry more buyer questions.
Who the engines think is asking
Each answer is classified by the buyer it is written for, then counted. Nothing here is an estimate of the market; it is who the answers were actually addressed to.
Share of answers by buyer type
Sized by how many answers were written for each
Shares are of the 2,807 answers that were written for a recognisable buyer, out of 3,015 in the run.
Which part of the decision the engines are answering
Every answer sits somewhere in the buying process. This is where they actually sit, and who each step brings into the room.
Where the answers land in the buying process
In journey order, sized by the answers that sit in each step
Shares are of the 2,938 answers that sit clearly in one step, out of 3,015 in the run.
The engines spend most of their effort on evaluation, which is 67.3% of the answers that sit in a single step. That is where a company is named or left out.
What the answers say the choice comes down to
Every criterion an answer raised, sorted by how many answers raised it. Technical is what the thing is; commercial is what the deal is.
Which way this category reasons
Share of all 3,015 answers that named a criterion of each kind. An answer can name both, so these do not add up to 100%.
Technical
Properties of the product or service itself
Shares are of the 2,040 answers that named a technical criterion, out of 3,015 in the run.
Commercial
Properties of the deal: price, terms, availability, location
Shares are of the 2,792 answers that named a commercial criterion, out of 3,015 in the run.
Location is the single most raised criterion in this category, named in 124 answers. A page that does not answer it is answering a question the engines are not being asked.
What the answers say gets in the way
Frictions the engines raise unprompted when describing this category, counted across the answers that raised them and ranked by how badly the answers say they bite.
Shares are of the 2,943 answers that raised one, out of 3,015 in the run.
The rules the answers keep bringing up
Compliance, licensing and certification requirements the engines raise unprompted, with how hard the answers say each one is to satisfy and who they name beside it.
Shares are of the 297 answers that raised one, out of 3,015 in the run.
Where the answers say this decision is made
Places the engines treat as mattering to the choice, and who they name in each.
Share of answers by place
Coloured by how wide a scope the answers gave each
Shares are of the 2,344 answers that named a place, out of 3,015 in the run.
The engines do not tell the same story
Each assistant builds its answer from different sources, so the company it puts first is often not the one the others pick.
Who each engine leads with
- ChatGPT
Expedia2.7 names per answer
- Gemini
Marriott6.6 names per answer
- Grok
Shape of the disagreement
Share of each engine's company mentions, top 4
Biggest swings
Companies one engine loves and another ignores
Hilton3.3%against1%
VRBO2.3%against0.6%
Airbnb2.3%against0.7%
Hyatt1.9%against0.5%
IHG1.6%against0.4%
Kayak1%against0.1%
5,242 companies were named across 3,015 answers, and no name owns this category in AI answers.
The words the engines attach to each name
Praise and criticism taken straight from the answers, not inferred.
A third-party hotel booking option centered on cancellation and accessibility filters, with 3.1% of mentions.
- “Free cancellation filter”
- “May have more leverage with the hotel”
- “Offers a free-cancellation filter”
- “A lower publicly available rate may create a BPG opportunity”
- “Accessibility filters”
- “Cannot issue a refund without the hotel's explicit permission”
- “May hide mandatory resort fees in fine print”
- “Usually provides no elite-night credit”
- “10%–15% third-party service fees”
- “A lower rate on a different website may require contacting support or submitting a form”
A hotel-chain option associated with direct booking, loyalty points, and accessible or kitchen-equipped accommodations, with 2.8% of mentions.
- “Direct booking option”
- “Modern”
- “Weekly housekeeping”
- “Associated with roll-in showers and reinforced grab bars in accessible bathrooms”
- “Full kitchens”
- “Exact availability and room features must be confirmed”
- “A 30-room block will take up a good portion of the property”
- “A busy airport property may charge even titanium members”
- “Accessible-suite inventory is limited”
- “Additional resort fees, parking, taxes, dining taxes, and gratuities”
A hotel-chain option built around direct booking, central locations, dining, breakfast, and kitchens, with 2.6% of mentions.
- “Central location”
- “Direct booking option”
- “Full kitchen”
- “On-site dining”
- “21 nights can earn loyalty points and elite status”
- “Not a true all-inclusive resort”
- “A suite or room configuration explicitly sleeping five must be confirmed”
- “About a 7–8 minute walk west to the riverwalk”
- “Additional resort fees, parking, taxes, dining taxes, and gratuities”
- “Automated enforcement provides little wiggle room after signing”
A hotel-chain option associated with flexible rates, free cancellation, loyalty discounts, and point redemptions, with 1.5% of mentions.
- “Flexible rates”
- “24–48 hour free cancellation”
- “48-hour cancellation option”
- “5%–10% loyalty-account discount”
- “A san antonio redemption is worth using at 1.7 cents per point or higher”
- “Additional resort fees, parking, taxes, dining taxes, and gratuities”
- “Automated enforcement provides little wiggle room after signing”
- “Availability is conditional: the response says 'if available'”
- “Availability is not guaranteed”
- “Availability isn't guaranteed”
A vacation-rental option for private outdoor space, pet filtering, and larger accommodations, with 1.4% of mentions.
- “Can provide a private yard”
- “Pets-allowed filter”
- “Access to larger rental accommodations”
- “Access to restaurants and shuttles”
- “Aircover may support rebooking in another ski-in/ski-out property”
- “Cleaning fees can be high”
- “10%–15% third-party service fees”
- “A crib must be requested in the booking notes”
- “A fenced yard is only available sometimes”
- “A four-night trip may be difficult to book”
A vacation-rental option centered on larger, configurable stays and bedroom, crib, and adults-only filters, with 1.3% of mentions.
- “Can provide a private yard”
- “2-bedroom condos may be available for $300–$375 per night”
- “Allows filtering for 3+ bedrooms or sleeps 6+”
- “Allows filtering for adults-only luxury cabins”
- “Allows filtering for crib or pack-n-play”
- “Cleaning fees can be high”
- “10%–15% third-party service fees”
- “A crib must be requested in the booking notes”
- “A fenced yard is only available sometimes”
- “A four-night trip may be difficult to book”
A hotel-chain option associated with loyalty discounts, points value, accessibility, and family-oriented benefits, with 1.1% of mentions.
- “5%–10% loyalty-account discount”
- “A san antonio redemption is worth using at 0.5 cents per point or higher”
- “ADA compliance is described as extremely serious”
- “Advertises a kids-stay-free program”
- “Airport properties may offer flexible cancellation options”
- “A lower total bill results in slightly fewer base points.”
- “Automated enforcement provides little wiggle room after signing”
- “Availability is not guaranteed”
- “Availability isn't guaranteed”
- “Benefits apply at participating hotels”
A free hotel loyalty program emphasizing late checkout, faster status qualification, and double-points promotions, with 0.8% of mentions.
- “Free loyalty program”
- “Free to join”
- “4:00 PM late checkout for platinum and higher tiers”
- “A 30- to 60-day stay can accelerate status qualification”
- “Active double-points promotions may be available”
- “A lower total bill results in slightly fewer base points.”
- “Award availability must be confirmed”
- “Benefits apply at participating hotels”
- “Benefits are subject to availability”
- “Benefits can vary with occupancy in portland”
A hotel-search and price-comparison option focused on rate aggregation and price alerts, with 0.7% of mentions.
- “Supports price alerts”
- “Can provide price alerts”
- “Aggregates rates from direct hotel sites and multiple OTAs”
- “Aggregates results”
- “Aggregates third-party inventory”
- “Aggregators occasionally miss overnight parking or municipal assessments”
- “Displayed prices may be cached or delayed”
- “Initial rates may exclude resort fees”
- “Late checkout is rarely a standard filter”
- “Listed base prices may be missing taxes and mandatory fees”
A free hotel loyalty program associated with high base earning, strong redemption value, and a fifth-night-free benefit, with 0.7% of mentions.
- “Free to join”
- “10–20 points per $1 base earning”
- “A 1.0-cent-per-point redemption is described as amazing”
- “A fifth night can be free for elite members on a standard reward stay”
- “A slower suburban property might waive the fee for silver members”
- “A lower total bill results in slightly fewer base points.”
- “Award availability may not show for the desired dates”
- “Benefits apply at participating hotels”
- “Benefits are subject to availability”
- “Benefits can vary with occupancy in portland”
What every engine agrees on
The answers favor tools and brands that make booking more flexible, searchable, or rewarding, but repeatedly require buyers to confirm availability, room details, eligibility, and the full cost of fees and taxes.
What is still contested
The category divides between hotel options valued for direct booking, loyalty, breakfast, dining, and standardized services and rental options valued for private yards, larger accommodations, and household-oriented filters.
How the answers tell these names apart
The axes the engines actually differentiate on
Marriott, Hilton, Hyatt, and IHG are associated with direct booking, loyalty points, and elite status, while Expedia and Google Hotels are associated with third-party inventory, rate aggregation, filters, and price alerts.
Hotel brands are praised for benefits such as breakfast, dining, kitchens, and loyalty, while Airbnb and VRBO are praised for private yards, larger rentals, and bedroom-based filters.
Free cancellation, flexible rates, and search filters are praised, but mandatory fees, delayed prices, limited inventory, and availability conditions recur across booking, loyalty, and hotel options.
Market context the answers volunteered
What has to be true before an engine names each one
For every leading name: the buying question it over-indexes on, the names it gets listed beside, and what the answers say it is for.
A third-party hotel booking option centered on cancellation and accessibility filters, with 3.1% of mentions.
A hotel-chain option associated with direct booking, loyalty points, and accessible or kitchen-equipped accommodations, with 2.8% of mentions.
A hotel-chain option built around direct booking, central locations, dining, breakfast, and kitchens, with 2.6% of mentions.
A hotel-chain option associated with flexible rates, free cancellation, loyalty discounts, and point redemptions, with 1.5% of mentions.
A vacation-rental option for private outdoor space, pet filtering, and larger accommodations, with 1.4% of mentions.
A vacation-rental option centered on larger, configurable stays and bedroom, crib, and adults-only filters, with 1.3% of mentions.
A hotel-chain option associated with loyalty discounts, points value, accessibility, and family-oriented benefits, with 1.1% of mentions.
A free hotel loyalty program emphasizing late checkout, faster status qualification, and double-points promotions, with 0.8% of mentions.
The claims the engines keep making about this category
Counted across every answer, and shown with what was actually said. A claim with no quotable sentence behind it never reaches this page.
How the claims read
Every recurring claim, split by whether it helps or hurts a company in this category
Every claim below was made by the same number of answers, so there is no ranking between them yet. Shares are of the 2,288 answers that made a claim about the category, out of 3,015 in the run.
The pages that manufacture this leaderboard
Get cited by these and you change what the engines say next.
Who the gatekeepers are
Citations are dispersed across search, specialized fee-checking, government, hotel and resort, travel platform and destination websites. Google.com and resortfeechecker.com are the only cited domains appearing twice; every other listed domain appears once.
Most cited domains
google.com
2
resortfeechecker.com
2
ada.gov
ag.state.la.us1
aman.com
1
amarasedona.com
1
arkansasstateparks.com1
artoflivingretreatcenter.org
1
azag.gov
balconessprings.com
1
booking.com1
bringfido.com1
Where citations come from
Every source the engines cited, classified. Competition is a named company's own site writing the answer.
Citation relationships
How the sources AI trusts cluster around the buying segments. Hover any node for detail.
Top citation pages
The exact pages the answers pulled from. Each one is a placement that shapes this leaderboard.
| # | Page | Category | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Other | 3.39% | |
| 2. | Competition | 3.39% | |
| 3. | Other | 1.69% | |
| 4. | Other | 1.69% | |
| 5. | Other | 1.69% | |
| 6. | Other | 1.69% | |
| 7. | Other | 1.69% | |
| 8. | Competition | 1.69% | |
| 9. | Competition | 1.69% | |
| 10. | Other | 1.69% | |
| 11. | Other | 1.69% | |
| 12. | Institution | 1.69% | |
| 13. | Other | 1.69% | |
| 14. | Other | 1.69% | |
| 15. | Other | 1.69% |
Where this category is unclaimed
Buyer demand that no company owns yet. Ranked by how much traffic sits there against how weakly the current leader holds it.
Outdoor and National Park Travelers · Buy
High priority138 answers sit in this lane and 579 companies compete for them. VRBO holds 3.9% of the mentions here, which is not enough to call it owned.
Luxury and Resort Experience Seekers · Buy
High priority138 answers sit in this lane and 585 companies compete for them. Virtuoso holds 2.2% of the mentions here, which is not enough to call it owned.
Wellness and Spa Retreat Travelers · Buy
High priority138 answers sit in this lane and 436 companies compete for them. Solage, Auberge Resorts Collection holds 1.5% of the mentions here, which is not enough to call it owned.
Value-Driven and Loyalty Bookers · Buy
High priority138 answers sit in this lane and 441 companies compete for them. Expedia holds 4.7% of the mentions here, which is not enough to call it owned.
Fee, Policy and Accessibility Checkers · Buy
High priority138 answers sit in this lane and 547 companies compete for them. Expedia holds 4.7% of the mentions here, which is not enough to call it owned.
Event, Meeting and Group Planners · Buy
High priority135 answers sit in this lane and 700 companies compete for them. Hilton holds 1.9% of the mentions here, which is not enough to call it owned.
What the answers leave on the table
Read from the run, with the evidence each reading came from
Wellness and spa retreat travelers
This is the weakest leadership position among the large travel segments. Canyon Ranch holds just 2.8% share of voice despite appearing across 336 answers and 634 companies.
Luxury and resort experience seekers
Luxury demand is broad but no player has established meaningful ownership of the answer. Virtuoso leads with 3.0% share of voice across 816 companies.
Event, meeting and group planners
Group-planning answers remain widely dispersed despite a substantial volume of questions. Hilton leads only 3.1% share of voice across 748 companies.
Domestic leisure trip planners
This is the broadest company set in any segment, creating a large discovery opportunity without a dominant answer owner. Expedia leads with 3.7% share of voice among 944 companies.
Outdoor and national park travelers
Outdoor and national park travel has a modest leader relative to the number of companies surfaced. VRBO leads 336 answers with 4.9% share of voice across 856 companies.
Fee, policy and accessibility checkers
Expedia has the strongest segment-level lead in the category, but still owns less than 7% of answer visibility. This leaves substantial room for hotels and resorts to become the direct authority on policies, fees and accessibility.
Where this category is moving
Trends the answers raised on their own, counted, plus what to keep an eye on next scan.
What the answers themselves predict
Forward-looking claims the engines made, counted and grouped by when
Shares are of the 22 answers that made a claim about the future, out of 3,015 in the run.
Trends the answers raised
Counted across every answer in the run
Sizing and growth the answers cited
Watchlist
What could move between this scan and the next
- 01Expedia's 3.1% category share of voice
- 02Marriott's leadership in buy, comparison and informational answers
- 03Wellness and spa retreat visibility
- 04Fee, policy and accessibility authority
- 05Event, meeting and group planning fragmentation
How this report was measured
Every figure above comes from these answers. Nothing is modelled, estimated, or carried over from a previous scan.
Engines scanned
Every question was put to each of these
Question coverage
How the questions were spread
- Buying topics
- 9
- Buyer intents
- 5
- Buyer personas
- 373
- Answers with a company in them
- 2,073
- Total company mentions
- 13,194
- Segment labels the answers used
- 2,048
Market scoped to US.
How a company gets counted
- 01Ask
Each of the 1,000 buyer questions is put to every engine as a buyer would ask it, with no brand named in the question.
- 02Read
Each answer is parsed into the companies it named, the order it named them in, how strongly it backed each one, and the sources it cited.
- 03Ground
A company is kept only if its name appears in the answer text. Anything the parser produced that the answer never said is dropped before it reaches this report.
- 04Aggregate
The kept mentions are folded across every answer, so one company written three ways counts once.
What each measure means
- Share of voice
- Of every company mention across the run, the percentage that named this company. It sums to 100 across the field.
- Reach
- The percentage of answers that named the company at least once. Two companies can share the same reach and very different share of voice.
- Conviction
- How strongly the answers back a name, weighting a top pick above a recommendation and a recommendation above a bare mention.
- Category concentration
- How locked up the category is, from the spread of share across every name found. Higher means fewer names absorb the answers.
- Position
- Where the company fell in the order the answer listed names in. Lower is earlier, and first place is counted separately.
A scan measures what the engines said on Oct 28, 2026, not what they will say tomorrow. Engine answers move, so a single scan is a position and a series of them is a trend.
The answers behind every number above
Each question as a buyer typed it, and the company each engine put first. Open any row to read the full answers.
See where you rank in AI Visibility for Hotels and Resorts.
This report ranked 5,242 companies across 3,015 AI answers. Pick yours and every chart above rewrites itself around you: your rank, your share of voice, the topics you lose, and the exact answers that never say your name.
What this report just told you
Expedia holds 3.1% of the voice in this category.
Buyers asking the obvious questions hear that name first, every time.
We move the company you care about up the list the assistants read from.
Only 7 of 5,242 companies hold any real share.
Everyone else is noise the engines mention once and forget.
We build the citation base that turns a mention into a default answer.
The top three names already hold 8.4% of the category.
The gap compounds. AI cites what AI already cites.
We break the loop with non-branded citations, not ads.
45 distinct question lanes run through this category.
Each one is a buying conversation with a default answer already attached.
We start with the lanes with the most demand and the weakest incumbent.
Become the answer in AI Visibility for Hotels and Resorts. In 7 days, guaranteed.
This report read 3,015 AI answers about AI Visibility for Hotels and Resorts and only 7 companies came out of them with real share. You could spend the next year earning those citations page by page, competing against every name on the leaderboard above. Or the team that runs 2.5M AI prompts a month can place you in the sources the assistants already trust, in one week.
- Full 1,000-prompt audit across 5 AI enginesEvery number in this report, at 20x the sample, with raw data export.20x the 3,015 answers behind this report
- 30-minute strategy callYour ICP, positioning and priority queries turned into a custom 7-day plan.the 45 open lanes above, ranked and assigned
- GenAI press campaign, written and distributedAI-optimized releases syndicated to the exact outlets the assistants cite.the 57 domains in the Sources chapter, targeted by name
- Citation lift monitored on this dashboardWatch ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI start citing you.all 3 engines, the same charts, updated
- Full results report plus a 30-minute walkthroughWhat moved, why it moved, and the roadmap for what comes next.this report again, with your line moving
Recent campaigns earned 44 to 380 non-branded citations each. Doing this yourself means earning them one page at a time, and Expedia is not standing still while you do.
Limited new-client slots each month. Free 30-minute review, no credit card, no contract.
- TodayA 30-minute call. That is your entire time commitment.
- TomorrowYour plan and your campaign are written. You approve.
- Day 7The citations land, and this report reruns with your line moving.
Leaders who bet on this team early
The same people behind the Accelerator have been putting brands in front of buyers for twenty years. Here is what working with them sounds like.
“Duran's the guy you want on your side if you care about staying ahead of the curve. Consistently years ahead on AI, SEO, PPC. If you get the chance to work with him, take it.”
“Who is the best internet marketing professional you know? Duran comes to mind, without question.”
“Duran has been the most significant catalyst to our growth over the last 4 years. I cannot give anyone a higher recommendation.”
“Duran's the guy you want on your side if you care about staying ahead of the curve. Consistently years ahead on AI, SEO, PPC. If you get the chance to work with him, take it.”
“Who is the best internet marketing professional you know? Duran comes to mind, without question.”
“Duran has been the most significant catalyst to our growth over the last 4 years. I cannot give anyone a higher recommendation.”
“Zen Media is the ONLY new media agency honored as a Top 100 company in North America by both the White House and the United Nations.”
“As a global CEO and investor, I've met my share of marketing leaders. I have a high bar. Shama and Zen Media came highly recommended, and after working with them I can see why.”
“Smart, devoted to our success, and most importantly know how to drive business results. They've positioned us as recognized thought leaders.”
“Zen Media is the ONLY new media agency honored as a Top 100 company in North America by both the White House and the United Nations.”
“As a global CEO and investor, I've met my share of marketing leaders. I have a high bar. Shama and Zen Media came highly recommended, and after working with them I can see why.”
“Smart, devoted to our success, and most importantly know how to drive business results. They've positioned us as recognized thought leaders.”
“Shama is a leader in the field of social media PR. I am constantly impressed by her expertise, integrity and vision.”
“You will not find a better marketing strategist for ecommerce, lead generation, and integrations than Duran Inci. Fully committed to achieving the best outcomes.”
“A leader who has found the exact calling she is perfectly suited for. She can conceptualize and execute plans more quickly than you could begin to define them.”
“Shama is a leader in the field of social media PR. I am constantly impressed by her expertise, integrity and vision.”
“You will not find a better marketing strategist for ecommerce, lead generation, and integrations than Duran Inci. Fully committed to achieving the best outcomes.”
“A leader who has found the exact calling she is perfectly suited for. She can conceptualize and execute plans more quickly than you could begin to define them.”